
A child actor since she was cast in various commercials as an 11-month-old, Panettiere was best known for her role as the country music star Juliette Barnes in the series Nashville.
(Image credit: Jon Kopaloff)

A child actor since she was cast in various commercials as an 11-month-old, Panettiere was best known for her role as the country music star Juliette Barnes in the series Nashville.
(Image credit: Jon Kopaloff)
This blog is now closed. Read more here
Republican senator Thom Tillis deplored Trump’s decision to cut US military drills with South Korea, which comes despite military officials from both countries warning that Kim Jong-un’s regime is learning new battlefield expertise, including new drone tactics, from assisting Russia with its war in Ukraine.
Tillis wrote on X:
South Korea has been a solid military ally for over 70 years that possesses exquisite military capabilities. Reducing joint exercises with South Korea does nothing more than free up thousands of North Korea’s troops to support Putin’s systematic kidnapping, torture, rape, and murder of innocent Ukrainian citizens.
Continue reading...Kemp’s ridley sea turtle, near death on Welsh beach in 2023, is thriving in Houston despite lingering pneumonia
A Kemp’s ridley sea turtle native to the Gulf of Mexico is largely thriving after he was found nearly dead on a beach in Wales in late 2023, nursed back to health and then flown to Houston recently to continue recovering – though scans revealed signs that the creature has been grappling with lingering pneumonia, according to his caretakers.
Rhossi’s condition was detailed in a blogpost on Friday from the Houston zoo, whose veterinary team was tasked with caring for the creature – believed to be no older than age four – and giving him the best chance possible at an eventual, successful return to the wild.
Continue reading...
В проектах у аналитика обычно есть знакомый набор инструментов: нотации, шаблоны требований, чек-листы, правила описания процессов. Но реальная задача редко укладывается в них полностью.
За сформулированным требованием может скрываться другая потребность. При проектировании интеграции приходится одновременно учитывать производительность и отказоустойчивость. А иногда нужно разобраться в нетиповой системе, которую несколько лет дорабатывали без актуальной документации.
В таких ситуациях важнее не знание конкретного шаблона, а способность разобраться в контексте, увидеть ограничения и выбрать подход. Этому посвящена секция «Прикладные компетенции аналитика» на INFOSTART A&PM EVENT 2026.
Читать далее
There’s something uniquely irritating about being forced to listen to whatever a stranger has decided to watch on their phone. Suddenly, the airport gate has a soundtrack—and it’s a tinny succession of TikToks, action scenes, and FaceTime chatter that no one else signed up for.
As Sammie Walker Herrera, a communication coach, puts it, you might be screaming internally: “When I said I listen to all kinds of music, I didn’t mean your music.”
Still, it’s one thing to object internally—and another to ask the person to turn it down. What if they get angry, ignore you, or turn up the volume out of spite? We asked etiquette and communication experts how to make the request without turning an annoying situation into an altercation.
Sometimes the easiest solution is simply to get out of earshot. Nicole Del Valle Rose, an etiquette coach and founder of the Las Vegas consultancy Poised & Proper, says the most gracious response is often the least confrontational one.
“Etiquette isn’t about correcting every behavior that bothers us,” she says. “It’s about choosing the response that creates the best outcome for everyone.”
If there’s another table open at the coffee shop or plenty of room elsewhere in the train car, relocate. You’ll solve the problem in seconds and spare both of you an awkward exchange. Save the conversation for situations where you’re truly stuck, like on a plane, in a waiting room, or aboard a packed bus.
It can be tempting to make sure the offender knows they’re being rude. Resist the urge.
“You don’t want to immediately put this person on the defensive,” says Walker Herrera, who runs Speak Y’all, a communication coaching business. “Frame how it’s impacting you, rather than that they’re doing something ‘wrong.’”
Plus, you don’t know why their phone is so loud. They might be hard of hearing, or they may not realize how far the sound is carrying. Treating it as a solvable volume problem—not evidence of a glaring character defect—makes it more likely that they’ll cooperate.
If you’re comfortable engaging for a moment, it can help to open with a little friendliness. Larry Schooler, an assistant professor of communication studies at the University of Texas at Austin, suggests first asking what the person is listening to. After they answer, he recommends saying: “Oh, cool. I was just wondering if you could maybe lower the volume or listen to it privately; I needed to concentrate on something and was just finding it hard to do.”
Showing interest softens the interaction, Schooler says. Most people would feel uncomfortable if the first words they ever heard from a stranger were instructions to stop what they were doing or change their behavior. Giving a reason for the request also helps them understand where it’s coming from, instead of concluding that you simply dislike their music, video, or podcast.
If you’d rather skip the small talk, Michelle Retsky, a speech-language pathologist and founder of Words in Motion Therapy in New Port Richey, Fla., teaches social communication for a living. She suggests starting with a genuine question: “Excuse me, do you happen to have headphones? I’m having trouble focusing, and the sound is carrying over pretty loudly over here.”
That frames the situation as a problem the two of you can solve together, which “takes pressure off of them,” Retsky says. If they do have headphones and agree to use them, problem solved. If they don’t, follow up with: “Would you mind turning it down?”
There’s no need to deliver a closing argument about the deterioration of public etiquette. The longer you talk, the more uncomfortable—and potentially charged—the exchange can become.
“Short-and-to-the-point requests can be incredibly effective,” says Claudia Johnson, a licensed marriage and family therapist in Seattle. Her preferred script is just five words: “Would you mind using headphones?”
Tone matters more than finding the perfect wording. Ask politely, Johnson says, and assume the person simply didn’t realize they were bothering anyone. Most people will be happy—or at least willing—to turn down the volume.
And if they refuse? Just walk away; don’t argue or try to teach them a lesson. “We can’t change how others act; we can only ask nicely,” Johnson says. “If they say no or act immaturely about it, that says something about them and not if it was OK for you to ask.”
If the noise is making a flight, train ride, or restaurant visit genuinely unbearable, ask an employee to intervene rather than escalating the interaction yourself, Del Valle Rose suggests. And if the person seems agitated or unpredictable, skip the direct request altogether. Your peace and quiet isn’t worth jeopardizing your safety.
Above all, don’t become fixated on finding a magical combination of words that will guarantee a pleasant response. Healthy communication “doesn’t come down to saying the ‘right’ things,” Johnson says. “It’s about having the courage to say what you need in a respectful manner, while giving others the dignity of deciding how they will react.”

In September 2022, I set myself a very public personal goal: to run a 5-minute mile.
It was a completely mad idea. I was 58 years old, and, although in reasonably good shape, the fastest I could then complete a mile was in just over six minutes. I had given myself only eight weeks to cut around 70 seconds off my time—a massive improvement that most people familiar with running thought was unattainable.
The appeal of the mile is that it is neither a sprint nor a marathon, requiring a combination of sustained speed and endurance—strong legs, strong lungs, and mental fortitude.
In my quest, age would be a factor. The fastest known mile by a runner over 60 is 4:49, set in 2020 by 61-year-old Dan King, a former University of Colorado athlete. While I am disciplined about my exercise and run seven days a week, my training is casual in its duration and intensity—and critically, I am no athlete. Yet I would be trying to run just 11 seconds slower than the record for someone roughly my age.
I hired a coach and—to make everything transparent and public—announced my goal on LinkedIn. I also approached running experts for their opinion and advice. I encouraged followers of my LinkedIn page to engage with my journey and set stretch goals of their own.
Why would I do this? Why would I set myself up for potential failure in such a public way?
As founder and CEO of Discovery, a global financial services organization started in South Africa with the goal of making people healthier, the challenge was an opportunity to improve my own health while demonstrating the importance of physical activity and encouraging others to lace up their running shoes. Data from Vitality—a business model we pioneered for health and life insurers that tracks over 60 million life years of health and wellness data to reward positive health choices—shows this compellingly: moving from no exercise to just one physically active day per week reduces the risk of death by 36%, with positive knock-on effects for other healthy behaviors and mental wellbeing.
But most importantly, I did it out of a deep, long-standing conviction to illustrate the power of setting and declaring goals: in this case, out loud and in public. Not only would I be motivating myself, but by declaring it publicly and encouraging others to set their own goals, I hoped to spark a chain reaction.
This wasn’t just a personal ambition; it was an experiment in human motivation. Behavioral science explains why goal-setting is profoundly effective.
As rational decision makers facing options under conditions of risk and uncertainty, we think we are motivated to choose the most rational option—the one with the best combination of value and likelihood of occurring. This thinking—codified in the 1940s as “expected utility theory” by game theory founders John von Neumann and Oskar Morgenstern—dominated decision theory for decades.
Expected utility theory assumes a linear relationship between rival potential gains—and between potential gains and losses. But this linear model was challenged in 1979 by Daniel Kahneman and Amos Tversky. Their theory—prospect theory—proposed that losses loom larger than gains, a phenomenon known as loss aversion.
In one experiment, participants reported feeling much worse about losing $100 than they felt good about gaining $100—despite the amounts at stake being the same. A foundational reason is that people evaluate outcomes relative to a reference point, typically the status quo, rather than in absolute terms. This reference point determines whether an outcome is perceived as a gain or a loss. Once a loss is perceived, loss aversion kicks in—an emotional response in which the pain of loss far outweighs the pleasure of gain. Losses are typically felt to be twice as impactful as gains of the same size.
The logic is this: by setting and declaring a goal, we put ourselves on the line. By putting something at stake, we create something to lose. And because avoiding a loss feels psychologically twice as valuable as achieving a gain, setting and declaring bold goals triggers this force, unlocking radical motivation and decisive action. By declaring a goal publicly, I created something to lose: my credibility and public accountability to my followers.
So how did my five-minute mile work out? I began, as all strenuous physical challenges should, with a health check and a baseline fitness assessment (which I also wrote about on LinkedIn). The latter gave me a cardiovascular fitness VO2 max result of 47.7, well above the 41 classified as “excellent” for men my age. My coach set me a brutal training plan, which he thought could—if all went well—slash my time by up to 30-40 seconds.
Over the next month, I stuck rigidly to my training routine. My time was improving: I managed to whittle it down to 5:40, which was stellar progress, but still a long way off from five minutes. I posted weekly “performance dashboard” updates on LinkedIn—and there, too, I saw huge gains toward my other goal of inspiring other people to set profound goals of their own. One person pledged to wrap up their PhD analysis within the year, and another set out to learn a new instrument. One of the most moving posts came from someone undergoing chemotherapy who decided to run about 3 miles in under 30 minutes—then followed up months later to say that even though it had intimidated her to set a personal goal publicly, she had achieved it.
About six weeks into my training, I got impatient. I thought, How can I run at close to 3 minutes per kilometer when I don’t train at that speed? So I pushed a little faster than my coach had suggested. Then, after my run, I went into a full-day board meeting where I sat, barely moving, for ten hours. I went home to do an easy run up a steep hill, and to my horror, I suddenly felt a sharp pain in my calf. I had torn my calf muscle.
I tried everything to fix it, including platelet-rich plasma therapy and hyperbaric oxygen therapy. I was gutted, but I had to face it: my challenge was over.
Of course, I was devastated that I didn’t achieve my goal. I had made the rookie error of going too fast too soon, and I was bitterly disappointed. But I also saw the bigger picture: I had brought my time down to 5:35, and my VO2 max had risen from 47 to 58. Nearing age 60, I was faster and fitter than I had ever been, and my running had leveled up. Moreover, people all over the world had started chasing goals of their own and sharing their progress. My 30 posts over eight weeks had reached close to 12 million people.
So, was it a success or a failure? In the final calculation, it was a success for several reasons. First, it engaged people in the importance of physical activity. Second, it proved my hypothesis: setting and declaring a goal takes you further than you would have gone without one. And third, even if you fall short of the destination, the goal—and the journey—will change you.
After my injury, one of my key takeaways was that I had nevertheless made remarkable progress as a runner. So, I set myself another goal: could I run a marathon again—something I hadn’t done in two decades—and do so at a reasonable pace, given my age? This time, I stuck to my training plan, avoided injury, and the answer was an emphatic yes.
In 2025, I ran the London Marathon in 3 hours, 37 minutes and 40 seconds, a time that put me in the top 20% of all finishers. I could never have achieved that time 20 years ago, let alone before my 2022 challenge. This had a positive knock-on effect: my result in London meant I qualified for the Boston Marathon, and I ran an even faster time in that race.
In my case, one declared goal—even a failed one—led to another. My limits expanded. And in the process, I experienced the transformative power of setting and declaring goals.
This excerpt was adapted from The Four Principles: Multiply Your Impact in Life and Leadership by Adrian Gore with permission from Macmillan Publishers.

14 августа Anthropic опубликовала второй Risk Report — 186 страниц о том, насколько опасны ее собственные модели. В разделе с будничным названием "Заметки о невыпущенных моделях" компания между делом сообщила: внутри работает модель под кодовым именем Model 2. Она сильнее Claude Mythos 5 — самой мощной модели, к которой Anthropic вообще кого-либо подпускает; ею пишут код и генерируют данные; выпускать ее не планируют. Axios подал эту строчку как главную новость отчета. Но если дочитать документ, новость там другая — и куда менее уютная.
Читать далее
В последние недели собрал и протестировал 15 пользовательских 1 моделей (CM). Не претендую на полноту изучения опции, но надеюсь, что кому-то мой опыт сэкономит время. Основной вопрос: как на поведение модели влияют материал для тренировки (DS), стили, Lyrics и параметры.
1 идея витала в воздухе, как только народ услышал генерации очень похожие на известных артистов. В Udio/ Suno требовались танцы с бубном, в Sonauto (ныне Treblo) достаточно было ввести имя в промпт. В конце 2024 г. один проф. певец задал мне вопрос: "Как генерить с моим голосом и манерой?". Сделал его RVC-модель, он: "Тембр точно мой, но манера не везде", а с DS для Suno v3.5: "... похоже, и тембр, и манера. А можно, чтобы вообще как я и чистый звук?" Ответ: "Нужна ваша собственная модель".
Кажется, первыми CM предложили Mureka (Personalized Model): DS из 100+ треков (до 4 мин.), разовый платеж $100-200, тренировка ~3 ч. (сам не пробовал). Zaptrem (основатель Sonauto) на запрос о CM ответил, что не раньше v3. Локальные/ "открытые" инструменты я не смотрел (в своё время помучился с RVC на Google Colab и HuggingFace), но … как-нибудь попробую.
Во всех экспериментах с муз. ИИ меня интересовало 2 момента: а) как это устроено; б) как облагородить свои треки — придать правильное и "живое" звучание. Я не профессионал, но мне не нужно, чтобы ИИ за меня сочинял. Думаю, композитору важно самому отвечать за каждую ноту. Хотя можно и так: "Сгенери в моём стиле, а я выберу".
"Наевшись" вариативности с Persona, Your Voice, да и вообще с генерацией в Suno, я решил тестировать CM сразу на ярком материале. У меня не было и нет планов создавать несуществующие песни знаменитостей 2, но с DS из треков известных певцов поведение CM (похоже/ непохоже) должно быть очевидным для многих. Suno не работает с хитами, но пропускает генерации от Sonauto/ Treblo, т.к. мелодия и текст другие. Треки очень близки к реальным артистам — если не фанат, решишь, что просто не слышал эту песню.
Читать далее
Привет, Хабр! Меня зовут Максим Темнов, я руковожу департаментом постгарантийной сервисной поддержки (ПГСО) в «РТК-ЦОД». Это девять складов с комплектующими, более ста тысяч «железок» на поддержке и специалисты, готовые привезти и установить ЗИП за считанные часы. Мы выручаем заказчиков с ИТ-оборудованием, когда угасает последняя надежда на его производителей или вендоров. В условиях санкций, штрафов, дефицита на российском рынке и сложных логистических цепочек в хорошем провайдере ПГСО важно… все. Его компетенции и ресурсы — единственная волшебная таблетка для заказчика. В статье расскажу, как обстоят дела с «железом» сейчас и почему паниковать на этот счет не стоит.
Читать далее
PALAU, Micronesia — The ride out to sea was, in a word, unpleasant. The coastal waters of Palau, an island nation in the western Pacific, are typically calm and electric blue, like what you might see on a screensaver or postcard. The country has put in place some of the world’s most rigorous protections to keep its marine environment pristine.
But on this particular morning in July, a super typhoon named Bavi was churning north of us in the Philippine Sea. Clouds darkened the water and battered us with rain as our boat seesawed through the swell toward the horizon.
Our destination was what you might call a coral garden — a patch of coral, about two miles from shore, that scientists had planted over the past couple of years in an effort to rebuild a damaged reef.
I was wet, cold, and nauseated when we arrived. So naturally, I strapped on a mask and jumped in.
Below me, I could see dozens of star-shaped metal structures that researchers had attached to the seafloor. They were studded with corals in all forms and colors: neon blue antlers, fluffy green mittens, baseball-sized brains. Some of the corals looked like a collection of human vertebrae. Others resembled miniature pine forests.

In the past two decades, governments, nonprofits, and even hotels around the world have dedicated hundreds of millions of dollars to replanting coral reefs like this one. Reefs are among the planet’s most endangered ecosystems: Rising ocean temperatures, pollution, and other threats have killed off an estimated 50 percent of live coral globally since the 1950s.
Those steep losses erode the irreplaceable benefits that coral reefs provide. They go far beyond tourism. Healthy reefs lessen coastal flooding from storms like Bavi. They also serve as nurseries and homes for larger animal species, such as endangered sea turtles and valuable fish like snappers and groupers that people eat.
That’s why so much time and money has gone into restoring these ecosystems globally. Including here in Palau. A different typhoon and warming waters had destroyed some of the region’s coral many years ago, which caused the local fishery to decline, according to Sharp Sakuma, the governor of Ngaraard, a Palauan state where the coral garden is located. “It’s our food,” Sakuma said of fisheries. So a few years ago, he asked local researchers to help bring the reef back.
But reef restoration has a fatal flaw.
Rising global temperatures are heating up the ocean and fueling marine heat waves, which kill reefs. That means that much of the coral that people painstakingly plant often ends up dying months or years later — simply because the ocean is too hot. It’s like planting trees to restore a forest that will soon burn in a wildfire. And this raises serious doubts about the role reef restoration can play in the recovery, and ultimate survival, of these iconic ecosystems.
The colorful antlers, mittens, and brains below me, however, were not your typical planted corals.
They were different.
And they may offer a new reason for hope.
These corals had all gone through what you might call a fitness test. In a lab on shore, marine scientists exposed them to extreme heat and scored them for their ability to tolerate warming. Corals on some of the metal stars here got top marks — they appeared resistant to heat. Those individuals may have more of a fighting chance at surviving as ocean temperatures rise.
These sorts of fitness tests for corals are inexpensive and unexpectedly low-tech: They take place in cheap, store-bought picnic coolers, like what you might bring to the park. But by helping researchers identify the hardiest corals, these tests could help overcome one of reef restoration’s greatest challenges.
Subjecting corals to hot water in a plastic cooler may sound ridiculous. Until you consider the stakes and the circumstances: As the planet warms, simply protecting our beloved, life-supporting places is no longer enough to save them. Neither is restoring them to some former state.
To truly help coral reefs endure, we may actually need to reengineer them.
Scattered across a remote stretch of the Pacific is a collection of more than 300 islands, which, together, form the nation of Palau. Many of those islands are no larger than a small house. And because they’re eroding at the base, they look as though they’re floating above the ocean. When you’re out at sea, it’s easy to pretend that you’re flying through the floating mountains of Avatar’s Pandora.
But the real magic is, without a doubt, underwater.
Palau is surrounded by a vast network of coral reefs, many of which are in near-perfect condition. The region has more than 400 coral species — for comparison, the Caribbean has about 70 — which form the base of a thriving marine ecosystem. On just one weekend of diving there, I encountered close to 100 sharks, more than a dozen sea turtles, and three enormous manta rays. (In my more than 20 years of diving, I’ve rarely seen such an abundance of sea life.)
In the last two decades, Palau has become an epicenter for research on how warming affects coral reefs. Part of that is practical: The country’s abundant corals allow scientists to study how different species and populations respond to rising temperatures. It’s also home to a well-equipped marine lab, the Palau International Coral Reef Center.
But there’s also an urgent local need. Palau is deeply dependent on its coral reefs: Its fisheries and tourism make up more than a quarter of the country’s GDP. And while Palau is home to one of the world’s largest marine protected areas — which bans commercial fishing across 80 percent of its national waters — that does little to protect the reefs here from the existential global threat of ocean warming.
Why is heat such a dire problem?
One “coral” is not a single animal but a colony of hundreds or thousands of individual animals, known as polyps. Those polyps are all nearly genetically identical. They grow the colony — the coral structure that you see on a reef — by cloning themselves over and over again.
Polyps fuel themselves, in part, by grabbing particles out of the water with tentacles (up close, polyps look a bit like sea anemones). But most of their food, and much of their color, comes from a kind of algae that lives within their cells. Like plants, that algae photosynthesizes. And it passes the solar energy it generates onto the coral, in return for nutrients and a place to live.
This partnership fails under extreme heat.
When the ocean is too warm, the algae malfunction, and the polyps kick them out. As a result, the corals lose their primary source of food and their iconic color. That’s bleaching. A bleached coral is not dead but starving, and it will die unless the water cools back down.
Yet there’s another key detail here: Some corals seem to resist this heat-fueled bleaching. They appear naturally more tolerant to warming than their peers. And you can actually see this when you’re snorkeling during a heat wave: Some corals will be bone white, whereas other colonies of the same species nearby will appear fully saturated. Heat tolerance is a trait with natural variation, like height or eye color in humans.
It’s this detail that underpins efforts to make reef restoration less futile in a warming world. If scientists can find local corals that can tolerate warming, they can use them to regrow native reefs that might endure some degree of climate change, here and anywhere coral reefs can be found.
What scientists in Palau are trying to demonstrate is how — absent a naturally occurring heat wave — you can identify those heat-tolerant colonies.
On a mostly clear afternoon in July, days before the typhoon grazed Palau, I boated out to a shallow reef with Steve Palumbi, a marine ecologist at Stanford University. He’s tall and thin and has white hair that he often pulls back into a short ponytail.
Once the boat dropped its anchor in the sand, Palumbi and I jumped in, along with three researchers from the Palau International Coral Reef Center (PICRC). I felt like I was swimming in a tropical fish tank. The water was clear and full of silvery fish. A carpet of colorful coral coated the seafloor. Every hole and crevice was occupied — by a giant clam, a spiky starfish, a sea cucumber, a furry crab. The reef was a giant apartment building with a cast of unusual tenants.
I followed Palumbi and the PICRC researchers over to metal structures on the reef that his team had built. They looked like sunken bed frames, and like those metal stars, they were covered in pieces of coral.
These corals are some of Palumbi’s guinea pigs.
Over the last two years, researchers in his lab at Stanford have been subjecting them to a variety of different heat tests and scoring their performance. The concept is simple: Put the corals in a tank, crank up the temperature, and measure how quickly each one bleaches. The colonies that stay colorful as the temperature soars — the “winners” — may be more tolerant to warming.
For years, scientists have been chipping away at this question. We now know, for example, that a polyp’s genetics has something to do with it; like height in humans, heat-tolerance is partly heritable and can be passed on from parents to their kids. The specific kind of algae living in the coral tissue — its solar power-plant partner — matters, too.
Yet there are still big unknowns. Scientists still don’t know exactly how the genes of polyps and algae may combine in some way to influence tolerance. In search of answers, a researcher in Palumbi’s lab, Brendan Cornwell, is running corals through heat tests, and then examining the genomes of the winners and losers in search of clues.
There are several different ways to measure a coral’s tolerance to warming in a lab. Some tests expose corals to moderately high temperatures over weeks, whereas others blast them with extreme heat over days, or even hours. Longer-lasting tests tend to better represent a natural heat wave — what corals will actually face in the years to come. But they’re expensive, time-consuming, and require expertise. That’s a problem for people who are racing to rebuild damaged reefs, especially in poor regions that lack fancy marine labs and funding.
Working with PICRC, the Nature Conservancy, and other partners, Palumbi’s lab has been trying to demonstrate that the quick and cheap version of these heat tests — using picnic coolers to pressure-test corals over a few days — works well enough. They can help identify heat-tolerant corals and, thus, improve reef restoration, all within one work week, and on a low budget.
That afternoon, Palumbi was collecting corals from those metal frames to test at PICRC. Using wire cutters, Palumbi and the other researchers snapped off branches of coral from the individual colonies. Breaking fragments of coral off a colony is not unlike taking clippings from plants — the “donor” colony continues to grow, even as parts of it are removed.

After filling plastic bins with dozens of coral fragments across three species, the researchers brought them to the boat, loaded them into a large container full of seawater, and then we headed back to shore.
It is hard to put a price tag on coral reefs, but those who have tried say it is quite a lot.
The authors of one study published in 2024 estimated that reefs in the Asia Pacific, which includes Palau, Australia, and Indonesia, among other countries, contribute about $25 billion a year on average to the region’s economies for their role in supporting fisheries and tourism alone.

That doesn’t include the damage that reefs offset during tropical storms. Coral reefs are self-regenerating seawalls that can reduce wave energy — dulling the fiercest brunt of a hurricane making landfall, for example — by an average of 97 percent. In the US, economists estimate that reefs save the country more than $1.8 billion a year just in avoided flood damage. Globally, the cost savings from coral reefs are far higher.
So it’s no surprise that people are so eager to rebuild reefs when they collapse.
To restore these ecosystems, people typically harvest fragments of coral from the wild and grow them in a tank on land or in a “nursery” in the ocean. Then they plant them, one piece at a time, on the seafloor, often using an adhesive putty.
Reef restoration has grown into a global project of enormous scale: A network called the Coral Restoration Consortium counts more than 900 reef restoration efforts worldwide led by more than 350 organizations. By one estimate, groups have spent more than $250 million on reef restoration over roughly the last decade.
But as important as those efforts may be, many of them haven’t worked — they haven’t actually helped coral reefs grow back. “Show me a square mile of reef that has been [successfully] restored,” Palumbi said. “There isn’t one.”
At the heart of that failure is climate change: Prolonged bleaching kills off much of the planted coral, undoing a tremendous amount of effort.

One of the most extreme examples of this is in Florida. In the last three decades, organizations have planted tens of thousands of corals in the Florida Keys, which is home to the world’s third-largest barrier reef. I visited in 2022 and saw the progress of restoration firsthand — there were beautiful fields of planted staghorn and elkhorn, two federally threatened coral species. Some colonies were more than a meter wide. I wrote a story about how it was reviving Florida’s reef.
Then in summer 2023, a record-breaking heat wave struck. The reefs turned a ghostly white. And eventually, nearly all of the staghorn and elkhorn coral in the Florida Keys — including the vast swaths of replanted corals — died, becoming functionally extinct. It was one of the more devastating things I’ve seen in my time covering the biodiversity crisis.
There are similar examples from around the world — in Colombia and Costa Rica, for example, along with Indonesia and the Seychelles.
It’s not that restoration groups are unaware of this problem. Scientists have been studying bleaching for many years in search of solutions. In Florida, researchers are testing out what happens if you cross-breed corals from South Florida with colonies from a warm reef in Honduras, which have a natural ability to withstand higher temperatures. Perhaps their hybrid babies will be more likely to survive the next heat wave. But most of these approaches are time-intensive, costly, run by teams of PhDs, or stuck in the lab.
“The lab science is cool,” Palumbi told me. “But it’s going too slowly. We don’t have time to wait.”
The outdoor research space at PICRC looked like a typical marine lab — a labyrinth of pipes and pumps and, of course, tanks full of sea creatures, which in this case included corals, urchins, and giant clams that would abruptly close if you got too close. It looked appropriately science-y. With the exception of one wooden shelf. On it were eight blue and red plastic picnic coolers, in which Palumbi’s team is doing the bulk of its heat testing.
After returning to shore with bins full of coral fragments, Palumbi put some of them into the coolers, which were fitted with small heaters and pumps. The water inside was around 30 degrees C (86 degrees F). That’s the average high temperature for waters in this region, and the baseline for the test he was about to run.
Then Palumbi, rather unceremoniously, cranked up the dial.

Over each of the next four days, the water in half of the coolers would hit a higher temperature, before returning to the baseline of 30 degrees. On day one, for example, it would reach 34; on day two, it would hit 35; and so on. And each morning, Palumbi would assess the fragments for bleaching. Although these tests run for only a few days, they’re meant to mimic what some corals might experience at low tide during a heat wave, Palumbi said.
I visited the lab early one morning, after just one day of heat stress — after the coolers had reached 34 degrees. Palumbi laid the fragments out on a white grid to evaluate their color, ranking them from one (no bleaching) to five (fully bleached). They were shaped like twigs and still had their normal orangy brown color. No bleaching yet. By the next morning, however, the corals appeared more varied: Some were starting to pale and others remained saturated.
On the last morning of the test — after the coolers had reached 37 degrees, or close to 100 degrees F — nearly all the fragments were white, resembling cauliflower florets. They had expelled their algae. And yet a handful of the fragments still appeared mostly brown. Even after getting blasted by extreme heat, they hadn’t bleached.
“Those are the champions,” Palumbi said.

Palumbi believes that quick heat tests like this stand to benefit restoration projects across the tropics. The equipment, including four coolers, costs less than $1,000, according to Courtney Klepac, a researcher in Palumbi’s lab, who studies heat testing. Groups that are rebuilding reefs can essentially run the corals they harvest through these tests, and then only plant the champions.
That’s precisely the idea behind a project Klepac leads called the Coral Futures Academy. She’s been helping environmental groups across the Pacific integrate these low-overhead heat tests into local reef restoration efforts. And these actually include the coral garden I snorkeled during the typhoon: All the pieces of coral there had gone through similar heat tests.
As promising as this approach sounds, however, there is an important caveat: These tests are only useful if they actually predict which corals are more likely to survive under real-world warming. And so far, scientists haven’t proven that.
Previous studies comparing short heat tests to those that are longer and more faithfully replicate a real heat wave show mixed results; the winners of one are often not the winners of the other. It suggests that surviving a short blast of heat requires different skills than withstanding warmth that lasts for weeks.
Some researchers have also measured what happens to corals that went through an even faster one-day test after they were put in the ocean and then experienced a real heat wave. The champions in those rapid tests were not always more heat-tolerant in the wild.
Ilan Bubb, a marine biologist at the University of Amsterdam who’s studied heat tests, says it’s like trying to predict a person’s marathon time based on how well they perform in a sprint. “We know there’s some correlation there, but how good is that correlation?” he said. “How much information you can get about that marathon from a hundred-meter sprint is still just undetermined.”
Palumbi, Klepac, and their colleagues have been exploring this question, too. They’ve compared bleaching scores from heat tests that last for three or four days to those that last for roughly two weeks. The results appear to be similar, Klepac said: On average, the same corals resisted or succumbed to bleaching in both experiments.
Klepac has also studied what happens to heat-tested corals when an actual marine heat wave hits. At the coral garden I visited with those metal stars, PICRC researchers planted the heat-test winners as well as the poorer performers, as a point of comparison. And as Klepac’s unpublished research shows, the winners of the short heat tests survived better during a bleaching event in Palau in 2024, compared to the losers.
“I am probably one of the few people that you will talk to that kind of low-key gets a little excited for bleaching events,” Klepac told me. “It is a very true test of what we’ve been doing. If we’re trying to market this approach, I want to feel confident that what we’re prescribing actually works.”
There are other drawbacks to this testing approach. For one, it relies on a visible trait — whether a coral resists bleaching or not. That trait, however, doesn’t always indicate whether the coral has the genes to resist bleaching. The colony may have just been healthier going into the test than its peers. Two runners, for example, might get different times in a 100-meter sprint, not just because of their genes but because of how much rest they got the night before.
This matters when you’re trying to rebuild a reef: Typically, you want the coral colonies you plant to eventually reproduce and create heat-tolerant babies. That only happens if the parents have heat-tolerant genes.
And there are other traits that corals need to survive, beyond the ability to withstand warming.
“It’s not just about heat tolerance,” said Liam Lachs, a coral researcher at University of Queensland in Australia who has extensively studied the value of different heat tests.
By only planting the corals that perform well on these heat tests, you might miss colonies that have other important strengths, such as the ability to withstand disease. In fact, future research may reveal that testing corals for one of these other traits may ultimately be a better predictor of their survival in the era of climate change, says James Guest, a reef ecologist at Newcastle University in England.
Palumbi readily admits that the short picnic cooler tests are not perfect. But the important question, he says, is whether they are good enough — good enough to start using them now to help reefs as the science around fitness testing gradually improves.
That much is clear, he says, and several other researchers I spoke to agreed. While the utility and accuracy of short heat tests is not yet proven, people who want to rebuild reefs should still use them, they said. For restoration, there simply aren’t many better alternatives.
“It’s quick, it’s easy to do, people can apply it relatively straightforwardly, and it offers some kind of test,” Guest told me. “Coming up with these practical approaches makes sense.”
The sun was still low in the sky as Palumbi and I strapped on our tanks and weights and plunged into the ocean near one of Palau’s floating islands.
Sinking down felt like descending onto an alien planet. There were rolling hills of branching coral and stacks of plate coral the size of merry-go-rounds. Schools of colorful fish flew over them, like flocks of birds across a woodland.

Toward the end of the dive, we came across a single coral colony as large as a suburban home. The surface was lumpy and covered in what looked like large bulbous fingers. Given its size, the coral was likely at least three hundred years old.
When we were back on the boat, I asked Palumbi what he thought of the reef. “It doesn’t get better than this,” he said.
Isn’t it arrogant to think we can recreate, or even fortify, something as complex as a coral reef?
There could have been 200 species of coral on this one reef alone, Palumbi said, some of which may still be unknown to science. If this is what coral reefs are supposed to look like, even our best science probably can’t recreate them.
It seems like our time would be far better spent trying to prevent reefs like this from dying in the first place. “We all know that we have to solve the bigger problem,” Guest said. “If we don’t reduce carbon emissions and we don’t deal with climate change, nothing we do is going to help corals.”

But the way Guest and other scientists see it, restoration — and the science to improve it — is not about recreating thriving coral reefs. The goal is much more humble, and much more depressing: to prevent as many species and reefs as possible from disappearing altogether so that, if and when the planet cools back down, there’s still something left to regrow.
Reef restoration encompasses a broad range of approaches, Guest said, meant to “stop species and populations from going off into an extinction vortex.” It would seem anything that might help that cause even a little bit — including a handful of plastic picnic coolers — is worth a try.

Привет, Хабр! Понадобилось мне в 2026 году установить XPEnology на ESXi, но актуальных инструкций я не нашёл. Восполняем этот пробел.
Инструкция будет полезна администраторам или DevOps, начинающим своё знакомство с XPEnology.
Внимание: в статье очень много картинок.
Для чего это может потребоваться
Например, можно:
- Ознакомиться с функционалом NAS Synology перед покупкой дорогостоящего оборудования.
- Протестировать установку или настройку новых пакетов.
- Протестировать сценарии перед их реализацией на реальном железе. Например, замену, дисков меньшего объёма на больший. Или обновление DSM 7.2 на 7.3

Достоверность результатов аудита информационной безопасности (ИБ) и соблюдение его сроков во многом зависят от качества предварительной подготовки. До начала проверки заказчику необходимо определить ее цели, согласовать с аудиторами порядок совместной работы и сформулировать ожидания от результата — если этого не сделать, проверяющим придется постоянно уточнять детали и переделывать уже выполненную работу. В результате сроки аудита увеличатся и содержание итогового отчета может не совпасть с ожиданиями заказчика.
Разбираем пять типичных ошибок, которые замедляют проведение аудита, и делимся способами их предотвращения.
The 12-time national title-winning coach discusses Connecticut’s time on top, his bond with Paige Bueckers, the Pat Summitt rivalry and why he isn’t retiring just yet
Let’s get one thing out of the way right from the jump: UConn Huskies coach Geno Auriemma says he isn’t retiring anytime in the “foreseeable future”.
That may come as a relief to fans of the program who have never known anyone else to be at its helm. Though he declined to promise an exact timeline, Auriemma made one thing clear while speaking to the Guardian last week: he’s going to be sticking around.
Continue reading...We take a look back at some of our favourite track and field images from Birmingham after Great Britain finished second in the medal table
Continue reading...Temperatures could drop by more than 15C compared with last Thursday as cold front moves in
Relief from the unrelenting heat is finally arriving this week across western Europe, with more unsettled conditions bringing the chance of rain. Temperatures are expected to fall back towards the seasonal norm, with some parts of the UK even falling about 3C below normal by Thursday. After such a scorching summer, and with a temperature drop of more than 15C compared with last Thursday’s heat, it may feel surprisingly chilly.
There are signs that some substantial rain could be on the cards for the south of the UK this week as a cold front moves in from the Atlantic on Monday night into Tuesday. As of Monday, parts of southern England had endured 62 consecutive days of no rainfall – this is observed at a Met Office weather station in Wisley, Surrey. Even the last recorded rainfall here on 16 June amounted to just 0.4mm.
Continue reading...
Уже довольно много лет руководители компаний, вкладывающих сотни миллиардов долларов в год в разработку различных инструментов искусственного интеллекта, настаивают на том, что в конечном итоге эта технология приведёт к сокращению времени, которое люди тратят на работу.
Четыре года назад технический директор Google заявил, что к 2025 году ИИ обеспечит переход на четырёхдневную рабочую неделю.
В начале этого года, всего через год после прогноза того технического директора, компания OpenAI приняла этот вызов. Она официально призвала компании начать тестирование четырёхдневной рабочей недели (без изменения заработной платы), утверждая, что ИИ вскоре сможет настолько ускорить человеческий труд, что корпоративный мир должен к этому подготовиться.
Однако бывший технический сотрудник OpenAI, уволившийся из компании в прошлом году, рассказал BBC, что пока он там работал, компания сама никогда не тестировала четырёхдневную рабочую неделю, которую она предлагала другим попробовать.
Вместо этого он описал зачастую изнурительную рабочую культуру, характеризующуюся частыми «кризисными совещаниями», работой по выходным и «чрезвычайно жёсткими» оценками эффективности, в результате которых коллег внезапно увольняли.
«Ты приходишь в субботу или воскресенье просто для того, чтобы наверстать упущенное или убедиться, что всё работает нормально», — сказал этот сотрудник.
Другие компании также продвигают идею о том, что ИИ эффективно сократит количество часов, которые людям нужно работать — к лучшему или к худшему. Компания Anthropic похвасталась тем, что её популярный инструмент для программирования и чат‑бот Claude способен работать самостоятельно в течение семи часов без перерыва, что по сути соответствует полному рабочему дню в компании. Марк Цукерберг из Meta заявил, что его компания находится в середине того года, когда «ИИ начинает кардинально менять наш подход к работе», и что такие инструменты позволяют гораздо меньшему числу сотрудников выполнять больше работы — гораздо больше, чем они когда‑либо могли бы сделать раньше.
Читать далееВсем привет! Меня зовут Андрей Лапкин. Около года назад я перешёл на роль архитектора ИТ-инфраструктуры в подразделении Эксплуатации музыкального сервиса Звук — и практически сразу мы запустили программу управления облачными расходами.
Облачная инфраструктура стримингового сервиса — это сотни виртуальных машин, десятки кластеров Kubernetes, объектные хранилища, базы данных, балансировщики. Ресурсы создаются под задачи, но далеко не всегда удаляются после их завершения. С ростом инфраструктуры вопрос «сколько стоит конкретный сервис?» потребовал системного ответа”.
За полгода систематической работы мы снизили ежемесячные расходы на инфраструктуру примерно на 22%. Для контекста: до старта программы счёт органически рос на 1–2% в месяц. Расскажу, как мы к этому пришли: какую методологию взяли за основу, какие принципы заложили в фундамент и как выглядит дорожная карта. Фокус статьи — на стратегии, процессах и культуре, а не на готовых шаблонах развёртывания.
Читать далее
Когда речь идет о промышленном сборе данных, даже компьютер-одноплатник иногда избыточен по габаритам. Если устройство встраивается в щиток, в корпус датчика или в готовый прибор стороннего производителя, каждый лишний сантиметр платы — это переделка корпуса. Для таких случаев мы разработали миниатюрный модуль — NAPI Slot, и еще несколько решений на его основе (мини-компьютер, коммутатор, мини-мрашрутизатор, шлюз). А сторонние разработчики могут сконструировать нужную плату c этим SOM под свои задачи.
Читать далее
Обучение LLM — это в первую очередь инфраструктурная задача: нужен пайплайн, который можно перезапускать с новыми данными, архитектурой или другим расписанием обучения и получать повторяемый внутри команды результат. В этом материале — рассказ команды обучения и инференса моделей RWB о том, как мы с нуля, без загрузки pretrained-весов, обучили текстовую модель на основе гибридной архитектуры Qwen3.5-2B-Base и какие выводы сделали по пути — от сборки датасетов до чтения графиков онлайн-оценки.
Читать далееAdditions of Guimarães and Tzolis, plus re-emergence of Ødegaard, mean champions start clear favourites after Community Shield win
If this was a glimpse of the Premier League’s new order then the rest had better watch out. By the time Martin Ødegaard sat Gianluigi Donnarumma down to make it 3-0 to the champions, the Arsenal party was in full swing. “Can we play you every week?” their supporters gleefully taunted their counterparts in sky blue.
Those in red and white who had made the journey to south Wales could barely believe what they were watching, even if winning the Community Shield is unlikely to spark the same kind of celebrations that were seen on the streets of north London in May after ending a 22-year wait to win the title. Having been forced to settle for three successive second-place finishes before finally reaching the summit, this time it was Manchester City’s fans who had to face the reality of being humbled by their closest rivals. As Viktor Gyökeres had put it beforehand: “Against City? In a friendly? We want to win.” That much was clear from the opening whistle at the Principality Stadium.
Continue reading...Revelation about security leak follows person pretending to be senior White House aide contacting prime minister
At least three UK cabinet ministers have had their personal mobile phone numbers published online, amid mounting concern over the security of senior politicians after Andy Burnham was targeted by an impersonation scam.
The defence secretary, Wes Streeting, the justice secretary, Alex Norris, and the Northern Ireland secretary, Chris Bryant, had their numbers available online with their names.
Continue reading...